| 
                Rules of Procedure 
       EPC
        shall be capable to adjudicate if at least half of the members and either
        the chairman or one of the two vice-chairmen are present. 
        EPC
        shall examine both the complaints received and the cases on their own
        initiative. EPC shall examine all received evidence and shall decide whether
        it would be a subject within the competence of EPC. 
        If
        the complaint remains clearly out of the competence of EPC, the chairman
        shall have the right to reject the complaint. The applicant shall have
        the right to protest the decision of the chairman and to strive for examination
        of the complaint by the whole EPC. 
        The
        chairman, vice-chairmen and the assistant may take steps in order to conciliate
        the parties involved. If it does not have any effect within one month,
        the complaint shall be examined as usual. 
        EPC
        shall not examine the case when: 
      
         
          - the case is already heard in the court or is under police investigations
 
          - the case has no connection to media matters
 
          - it is obvious that it is a legal pleading
 
          - the subject of the complaint cannot be determined
 
          - the contents of the complaint is indecent
 
          - the complaint is anonymous. 
 
         
      
       The
        applicant shall be informed of the reasons for rejecting the complaint
        without examination. 
        EPC
        may examine the case on the request of the law court. 
        EPC
        shall examine the materials published (broadcasted) no earlier than six
        months ago. On their own initiative EPC may also examine materials published
        earlier. 
        The
        case can be examined if all the parties involved have given their comments
        to the case. The case may be examined without these explanations and objections
        if they were not given within one weeks. EPC invites the parties or other
        people involved to the hearing, if necessary. 
        The
        meeting of EPC is conducted by the chairman (in his absence one of the
        vice-chairmen). The adjudication shall be made by voting when at least
        one of the members wishes it. The decision shall be made with simple majority
        of votes. In the case of an equal division of votes the chairing person
        shall have the decisive vote. 
        Non-members
        of EPC shall have the right to participate in the meeting when permitted
        or invited by the chairing person. 
        The
        adjudication shall be worded and signed within 10 days after making it.
        After signing, the adjudication shall be sent to the parties involved
        and put on the Internet within one day. The adjudications are also circulated
        to the members of the member organisations of the NGO "Avalik Sõna". 
        Generally,
        a single complaint shall be examined and adjudicated within six months. 
        In
        case the complaint was upheld, the newspaper/station has the priority
        to print/announce the full text of the adjudication within 7 days. If
        the media organisation does not follow that rule, EPC shall make the adjudication
        public by other means of mass communication. EPC may drop the obligation
        to print the adjudication to protect the private life of the individuals
        concerned. 
        If
        the adjudication on the upheld case is of public interest, EPC shall inform
        the media of the fact that the case has been upheld. It is the prerogative
        of the critisized newspaper/station to make the text of the adjudication
        public within 7 days. The case not upheld shall be public immediately
        after the adjudication is signed. 
			 |